“Well, we live in a technological age. Time has passed, and we have stepped over the ruins of our own societies, and our own civilisations, and we come now to the fruition of those things about which the human race has dreamed. We have flight and we have electronic assistants. The entertainment media – which are always very timorous and step very carefully out of fear and loathing – don’t know what they’re doing so much. So they go back, and they are catching up on the kind of science fiction – and they call it, in that ugly, ugly phrase, “sci-fi,” which those who have worked in speculative fiction despise, it’s like calling a woman a “broad” – they are catching up on ideas that were covered with hoarfrost 60 years ago. That’s why you have an overabundance of zombies and walking dead, and world war and asteroids from space. They have not yet tackled any of the truly interesting discussions of humanity that are treated in speculative fiction. But they are a break from standard 19th, early 20th-century fiction, and so they seem fresh to an audience that is essentially ignorant…”
“I keep reading books and seeing movies where nobody can fucking say anything except fuck, unless they say shit. I mean they don’t seem to have any adjective to describe fucking except fucking even when they’re fucking fucking. And shit is what they say when they’re fucked. When shit happens, they say shit, or oh shit, or oh shit we’re fucked…”
I haven’t seen Man of Steel, haven’t read the script, and I’ve assiduously avoided spoilers.
But that PG-13 on Man of Steel is making me nervous. I don’t know what it means… if it’s just the cost-of-doing-business, or even if it’s an MPAA-bias against all superhero violence.
I just know that if you make a Superman movie you can’t take kids to, you’ve done something wrong.
“The four and a half minute compliation of every Ray Harryhausen animated creature in feature films, presented in chronological order.”
The Ray Harryhausen Creature List (by Mat Bergman)
Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy.
“Welcome to the BBFC Classification Guidelines Review online survey.
“From Friday 1 March for six weeks, anyone is able to complete the online survey, helping to contribute to the large scale public consultation exercise the BBFC carries out every 4-5 years. The Review ensures the BBFC Classification Guidelines for age rating films are in step with public opinion.
“The online survey is an important part of the Classification Guidelines Review process and we’re keen for both adults and young people to take part. The survey takes around 10 minutes to complete.
“The results of the online survey will be processed alongside the results of nationwide focus groups, telephone interviews and specialist research, giving the BBFC the views of around 10,000 members of the public. The updated BBFC Classification Guidelines will be published at the end of 2013. The previous BBFC Classification Guidelines Review was carried out in 2009…”
“How could a film made on a low budget with a respected scriptwriter with a clear grasp of the material and not one, but three of the best character actors working today in the three main roles take so little money? Why did it fail? Who killed Judge Dredd? Let’s look at the evidence…”
‘Parasitoid’ by Forgotten Boneyard (by Forgotten Boneyard)
“This latest technological “advance’ reaffirms one of my key beliefs: We’re far too focused on technology these days we are creating a lot distractions to what can make a film truly powerful. So many of these new technologies threaten the magic of film by making the experience a little too “hyper real” if you will. Having only one of 8 characters in focus during an important soliloquy, or another person crossing frame out of focus and motion blurred can be a good thing to make the audience become more immersed in the film… they don’t need to see EVERYTHING to become “immersed” in my opinion… Something to think about…”
“The BBFC, who have made great (and rather disingenuous) play of the fact that they no longer cut films except when absolutely necessary (a necessity caused by their own self-imposed rules rather than any evidence of harm, I should point out), recently carried out what they laughably call ‘research’ into public attitudes towards depictions of rape, sexual and sadistic violence (so, no leading phrases there…). In this case, 35 people across London, Bristol and Dundee were asked to watched and comment on a number of recent controversial films that had either been passed uncut, cut or banned.
“Let’s think about that for a moment. 35 people in three cities – two in the South of England and one in Scotland. No serious scientific researcher or public opinion market researcher would consider this to be anywhere near the number and variety required to use to gain any level of information about public attitudes…”
“1971: The Bride of Dr. Phibes. Proposed to AIP by William Goldstein and James Whiton as a sequel to the first film. Set in the year 1934, it details a battle of wits between Phibes and a strange man named Emil Salveus, a member of a secret Satanic society called the Institute for Psychic Phenomena. We learn that Salveus is actually Lem Vesalius, the son of Joseph Cotten’s The Abominable Dr. Phibes character, Henri Vesalius. Salveus steals Victoria’s body, and Phibes kills the members of the IPP in a quest to recover her…”
“In June, director Martin Scorsese tried to show his 1993 film The Age of Innocence at the Museum of the Moving Image in Queens. Thelma Schoonmaker, Scorsese’s editor for the past 40 years and a three-time Oscar winner, called Grover Crisp, the senior VP of asset management at Sony, for a 35mm print. But Sony not only didn’t have a print, it couldn’t even make one.
“”He told me that they can’t print it anymore because Technicolor in Los Angeles no longer prints film,” Schoonmaker recalled. “Which means a film we made 20 years ago can no longer be printed, unless we move it to another lab—one of the few labs still making prints.”
“Welcome to the digital world, movie version….”
“The closer he looks at the child, the less he sees … The more he looks at it, there’s nothing there. He fears that the more you look at him the less you see. There isn’t anything there.”
—John Hughes
(via themerrypranxter)

I am imagining this as a real physical fight. In an ice cream factory. On a really hot day.